Choose an OA publisher for your research
- OA publishing may incur costs for the author in the form of article processing charges and authors should be aware of predatory publishing practices.
- The following checklists and resources may help evaluate OA publishers and identify recognized OA platforms that meet best practice in OA publishing.
Think. Check. Submit. Provides a range of tools and resources to help authors identify trusted journals and publishers. The service has been produced with the support of a coalition of scholarly and research organizations.
Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA), a membership organization established to represent and promote Open Access publishing globally, and in all scientific, technical and scholarly disciplines.
- OASPA publish a list of members that follows best practice and have undergone an application review process and adhere to OASPA's Code of Conduct.
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics): an organization that upholds ethical practices in publishing.
- Check if a publisher (and specific journal) is a member of COPE
Choose a repository for your research
Choose a repository for your data and code
- The Open data movement calls for data that can be freely shared and used, and promotes greater accountability and transparency in research practice and communication
- Academic journals and funding bodies may require authors to share the datasets associated with their research findings.
- Datasets are a recognized research output and can increase a researcher's visibility and impact.
- Registry of data repositories
- Source code repositories
- GitHub: A distributed version control system for the collaborative development of software. Public repositories are free and unlimited. Various pricing plans are available for private repositories.